Use of natural cooling parameters for stabilizing soils in the permafrost state

Aim. This study aims to use natural weather conditions of the environment, caused by forming the dominant characteristics of the geometric model associated with freezing profiles of the industrial soil foundation in the natural surroundings. These profiles were obtained during soil investigations, followed by a direct laboratory analysis of soil samples, depending on the sampling depth. The relevance of the research is determined by Arctic development and climate change.

Materials and methods. The work is based on the results obtained in fields of not only geological engineering and natural spatial measurements, but also the philosophy of science. The relationship between the characteristics of varying parameters of heat transfer in foundation subsoil waters was empirically determined to ensure an optimal selection of materials and technologies employed in construction.

Results. The conducted study and computer modeling determined the nature of motion, formation, and impact of near-surface water on industrial soil foundations. Based on the stabilization of soil and industrial foundation states and the stability of essential characteristics associated with their natural state, the key aspect for developing the concept of design and construction under the conditions of permafrost soil was identified.

Conclusions. It is established that the parameters of thermal stabilization of soil foundations are inapplicable in subzone I₁.

1. Rosenberg I.N., Starostina T.A. Solving placement problems with fuzzy data using geoinformation systems. Moscow: Nauchnyi mir Publ.; 2016. 218 р. (in Russian).

2. Tsvetkov V.Ya. Gray relational analysis. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovanii [International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research]. 2018;(12-1):166 (in Russian).

3. Tsvetkov V.Ya. Informational approach. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovanii [International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research]. 2016;(4-3):645 (in Russian).

4. Tsvetkov V.Ya. Situational modeling in construction. Informatsionnye tekhnologii = Information technologies. 2018;(4):69-74 (in Russian).

5. Savinykh V.P., Tsvetkov V.Ya. Geodata As a Systemic Information Resource. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2014:84(5):365-368. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331614050049

6. Ukhov S.B., Semenov V.V., Znamenskiy V.V., Ter-Martirosyan Z.G., Chernyshev S.N. Soil mechanics, foundations and Foundation. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola Publ.; 2004. 566 p. (in Russian).

7. Poleshchuk S.A. Effectiveness of the system approach (construction). Volgograd: Volgograd scientific publishing house; 2010. 252 p. (in Russian).

8. State Standard 30416-2012. Soils. Laboratory tests. General provisions. Moscow: Standartinform; 2013. 12 p. (in Russian).

9. Teniryadko N.I., Pykhteeva N.F. Soil mechanics: methodological guidelines for solving problems and processing the results of laboratory work of all forms of training and all specialties of the “Construction” direction. Ekaterinburg: UrFU; 2009. 28 p. (in Russian).

10. Tsvetkov V.Ya. Information Relations. Modeling of Artificial Intelligence. 2015;8(4):252-260.

11. Pospelov D.A. Situational Management: Theory and Practice. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 1986. 284 p. (in Russian).