Preview

Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction

Advanced search

Origins of scientific knowledge. Ancient oriental studies and their impact on the future of science

https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2022-1(32)-154-162

Abstract

This article argues that contemporary research and educational literature attributes the birth of science to Ancient Greece or the Renaissance period in Europe during the 15th—17th centuries. Such a Eurocentric approach, in the author's opinion, is insufficiently convincing. The article provides specific examples to demonstrate that sophisticated scientific knowledge first appeared in the Ancient East, while the natural philosophers and thinkers of Ancient Greece and the so-called Hellenic world either appropriated this knowledge or used it as a basis for their discoveries, often without mentioning the original source. As evidence, the article discloses the history behind the origin of primary scientific knowledge in a number of countries in the Ancient East, its content and impact on the development of ancient eastern civilizations and science as a whole. Particular attention is paid to the practical application of theoretical knowledge in several applied fields of economic activity, such as construction, architecture, road building, hydraulic engineering, and others. In conclusion, the article reveals reasons for the limitation and utilitarianism of this knowledge, since it provided only ready-made solutions lacking critical evaluation and rational justification. Moreover, the system of evidence was rarely considered important. All these factors ultimately prevented the formation of a system of fundamental science.

About the Author

V. I. Nikitin
JSC Research Center of Construction
Russian Federation

Valeriy I. Nikitin - Cand. Sci. (History), Professor of the Philosophy Department, JSC Research Center of Construction.

2nd Institutskaya str., 6, bld. 5, Moscow, 109428.

tel.: +7 (499) 170-70-94



References

1. Lurie S.Ya. Archimedes. Moscow, Leningrad: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences; 1945, p. 13 (in Russian).

2. Van der Waarden. Awakening science. Mathematics of ancient Egypt, Babylon and Greece. Moscow: GIMFL; 1959, p. 17-18 (in Russian).

3. Leshkevich T. Year. Philosophy of Science. Moscow: INFRA-M; 2006, p. 7-8, 42-47 (in Russian).

4. Kazyutinsky V.V. The concept of global evolutionism in the scientific picture of the world. On the modern status of the idea of global evolutionism. Moscow: IF of the USSR Academy of Sciences; 1986, p. 70 (in Russian).

5. Stepin V.S. Philosophy of Science. Common problems. Moscow: Gardariki; 2006, p. 127 (in Russian).

6. Vernadsky V.I. Scientific thought as a planetary phenomenon. Philosophical thoughts of a naturalist. Moscow: Nauka; 1988, p. 87 (in Russian).

7. Bohr N. Atomic physics and human cognition. Moscow: Publishing House of Foreign Literature; 1961 (in Russian).

8. Emelyanov V.V. Pre-philosophy of the Ancient East as a source of a new philosophical discourse. Questions of philosophy. 2009;9:153-163 (in Russian).

9. Lebedev S.A., Ilyin V.V., Lazarev F.V., Leskov V.V. Introduction to the history and philosophy of science. Moscow: Academic Project; 2005, p. 10-14 (in Russian).

10. Ancient civilizations of the East. Moscow: Lomonosov; 2020, p. 49, 169-171, 198-199 (in Russian).


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Nikitin V.I. Origins of scientific knowledge. Ancient oriental studies and their impact on the future of science. Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction. 2022;32(1):154-162. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2022-1(32)-154-162

Views: 5968


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-9494 (Print)
ISSN 2782-3938 (Online)