Applicability of the regulatory approach for reducing the modulus of elasticity under short-term actions for high-strength concretes
https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2026-1(48)-07-20
EDN: DPMORZ
Abstract
Introduction. According to SP 63.13330.2018, when calculating the second group of limit states for shortterm loads, the modulus of elasticity of concrete is taken with a reduction factor of 0.85. Historically, this factor accounted for inelastic deformations and short-term creep. However, its validity for modern high-strength (B80–B100 and higher) and modified concretes, as well as for steel-concrete composite structures, has not been experimentally confirmed.
Aim. An experimental and theoretical assessment of the applicability of the 0.85 factor to the initial modulus of elasticity of high-strength modified concretes under short-term actions on pre-loaded structures.
Materials and methods. More than 100 specimens of self-compacting concrete class B90–B100 with a modulus of elasticity of 55 GPa were tested: prisms, cylinders, steel-concrete composite prisms with steel plates, and cores extracted from pre-compressed columns. The following scenarios were implemented: standard tests, increased load holding times, elevated stress levels (up to 80 %), long-term pre-compression (over 3 months) followed by additional loading, and core tests. The modulus of elasticity was determined according to GOST standards and by a developed methodology (between loading stages).
Results. The deformation behavior of the concrete under study was almost linear up to failure, with minimal microcracking and creep. The maximum reduction in the modulus of elasticity across all scenarios did not exceed 10 %, and for reference prisms it was no more than 7 %, which is lower than the standard 15 %. The applicability of the findings to steel-concrete composite structures and the feasibility of estimating the modulus of elasticity from core samples were confirmed.
Conclusions. For high-strength modified concretes, the application of a reduction factor of 0.9 instead of 0.85 under short-term loads is justified, which allows for a reduction in the design horizontal displacements of high-rise buildings by 5–10 %.
Keywords
About the Author
P. D. ArleninovRussian Federation
Arleninov Petr D., Candidate of Technical Sciences, Deputy Head of the Reinforced Concrete Mechanics; Associate Professor of the Department of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Structures (RCS)
Moscow, 2nd Institutskaya str., 6, bld. 5, 109428; Yaroslavskoye Shosse, 26, Moscow, 129337
References
1. Berg O.Ya., Shcherbakov E.N., Pisanko G.N. High-Strength Concrete. Moscow, Publishing House of Literature on Construction, 1971, 208 p. (In Russian)
2. Travush V.I., et al. The stiffness of steel-plate composite structures for short-term loads. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering, 2024, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 105–118. doi: 10.22337/2587-9618-2024-20-4-105-118
3. Taube C., Flohr A., Morgenthal G. Experimental investigations on the influence of the short-term load history on the creep behaviour of normal concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, no. 473(1), Article 121073.
4. Mithaiwala M.E., Patil A.A., Khadake N.V. A review on effect of different set of stiffness modifiers varying through height of structure on analysis of multi-story R.C.C. structure. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 2020, vol. 7, issue 6, pp. 2395–0056.
5. Gvozdev A.A., Dmitriev S.A., Nemirovsky Ya.M. On the calculation of displacements (deflections) of reinforced concrete structures according to the draft of new codes (SNiP II-B.I-62). Concrete and Reinforced Concrete, 1962, no. 6, pp. 245–250. (In Russian)
6. Gvozdev A.A., Dmitriev S.A., Gushcha Yu.P., Zalesov A.S., Mulin N.M., Chistyakov E.A. New developments in the design of concrete and reinforced concrete structures. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1978. 208 p. (In Russian)
7. Zalesov A.S., Kodysh E.N., Lemysh L.L., Nikitin I.K. Analysis of reinforced concrete structures for strength, crack resistance and deformations. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1988. 320 p. (In Russian)
8. Ivanov A. Development of theory and applied methods for assessing the strength resistance of monolithic civil buildings considering nonlinear deformation. Doctoral thesis in Technical Sciences: 05.23.01. Moscow, 2008. 361 p. (In Russian)
9. Kaprielov S.S., Arleninov P.D., Sheinfeld A.V., Kalmakova P.S. Influence of relative air humidity on the creep coefficient of high-strength self-compacting concretes. Construction Materials, 2025, no. 10, pp. 25–35. (In Russian). doi: 10.31659/0585-430X-2025-840-10-25-35.
10. Arleninov P. Short-term and long-term testing of beams made of high-strength concrete with different types of reinforcement. Construction of Unique Buildings and Structures, 2025, vol. 120, Article 12006. doi: 10.4123/CUBS.120.6
11. Martirosyan A.S., Travush V.I., Kashevarova G.G. Study of the influence of rigid reinforcement geometry on load distribution in elements of steel-concrete composite structure. PNRPU Bulletin. Applied Ecology. Urban Development, 2017, no. 1, pp. 147–158. (In Russian). doi: 10.15593/2409-5125/2017.01.13
12. Travush V.I., Kaprielov S.S., Konin D.V., Krylov A.S., Chilin I.A. Experimental studies of steel-reinforced concrete structures under bending. Building and Reconstruction, 2017, no. 4, pp. 63–71. (In Russian).
13. Tamrazyan A.G., Arutyunyan S.N. On the reliability assessment of steel-concrete composite floor slabs with profiled sheeting. Bulletin of Civil Engineers, 2015, no. 6 (53), pp. 52–57. (In Russian).
14. Varma A.H., Malushte S.R., Sener K.C., Lai Z. Steel-plate composite (SC) walls for safety related nuclear facilities: Design for in-plane forces and out-of-plane moments. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2014, vol. 269, pp. 240–249. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.09.019.
15. Travush V.I., et al. Static bearing capacity of steel-plate composite walls. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering, 2023, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 166–181. doi: 10.22337/2587-9618-2023-19-4-166-181
16. Travush V.I., Konin D.V., Krylov A.S., Arleninov P.D., et al. Strength and deformability of bent steelconcrete composite elements with steel plates considering cracks. Building and Reconstruction, 2025, no. 5 (121), pp. 42–56. (In Russian). doi: 10.33979/2073-7416-2025-121-5-42-56.
17. Travush V.I., Arleninov P.D., Desyatkin M.A., et al. Investigation of creep of steel-concrete composite specimens. Building and Reconstruction, 2024, no. 1 (111), pp. 49–63. (In Russian). doi: 10.33979/2073-7416-2024-111-1-49-63.
18. Kaprielov S.S., Sheinfeld A.V., Selyutin N.M. Control of heavy concrete characteristics affecting structural stiffness. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering, 2022, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 24–39. doi: 10.22337/2587-9618-2022-18-1-24-39.
19. Kolchunov V., Fedorov S. Serviceability limit state parameters for high strength concrete structures. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering, 2024, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 145–158. doi: 10.22337/2587-9618-2024-20-3-145-158
20. Krylov S.B., Arleninov P.D., Kalmakova P.S. Comparison of test methods for concrete modulus of elasticity according to Russian and foreign normative documents. Construction Materials, 2022, no. 9, pp. 4–9. (In Russian). doi: 10.31659/0585-430X-2022-806-9-4-9.
Review
For citations:
Arleninov P.D. Applicability of the regulatory approach for reducing the modulus of elasticity under short-term actions for high-strength concretes. Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction. 2026;48(1):7-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2026-1(48)-07-20. EDN: DPMORZ
JATS XML

















