Preview

Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction

Advanced search

Influence of intramodular joints stiffness to the stress-strain behavior of modular buildings constructions

https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2026-1(48)-126-145

EDN: ILLQVL

Abstract

Introduction. The steel structure joints stiffness significantly affects the distribution of internal forces in the frame elements. This point is true for modular buildings too. Intermodular joints affect the stress-strain behavior of the whole building, while the intramodular joints stiffness of affects the stress-strain behavior of each module individually. The object of the research is steel modular buildings made of assembled modules with load-bearing corner columns.

Aim. Studying the stress-strain behavior of steel modular buildings with rigid and semi-rigid intra-modular joints exposed various loads.

Materials and methods. To assess the influence of the joints stiffness to the stress-strain behavior of modular buildings, a series of studies were conducted with various connection parameters using the finite element method. A total of 921 joints models were calculated. To confirm the results obtained by the numerical method, physical tests of full-size specimens of the joints were carried out. The main assumptions for the creating of calculation model have been formulated. Based on the identified assumptions, equations were obtained that explicitly describe the influence of the rotational stiffness of intra-modular joints to the distribution of internal forces in the elements of the module and to the natural vibration frequencies of the building.

Results. Within the framework of numerical studies using the finite element method, a significant influence of the presence of stiffeners and their dimensions on the intra-modular joints stiffness was established. It is shown that nodes without stiffeners are generally semi-rigid. For the design of rigid intra-modular joints, nomograms have been compiled for the assignment of minimum stiffeners sizes. Physical tests of full-size joints specimens confirmed the results obtained in numerical studies. A calculation analysis using the obtained equations showed that failure to take into account the actual joint stiffness o when calculating the rod model of a modular building can lead to significant inaccuracies in determining the internal forces and frequencies of natural vibration.

Conclusion. The conducted researches show a significant influence of intra-modular joints stiffness to the stress-strain behavior of steel modular buildings. It is necessary to take into account the joints stiffness when calculating modular buildings. It is of interest to conduct similar studies for other structural schemes of modular buildings with different structural solutions of joints.

About the Authors

V. S. Shirokov
Samara State Technical University
Russian Federation

Viacheslav S. Shirokov, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Associate Professor, Department of Structural Mechanic, Foundations, Metal Structures

AuthorID: 665300

ResearcherID: N-5278-2016

Molodogvardeyskaya str., 244, Samara, 443100



T. A. Belash
JSC Research Center of Construction
Russian Federation

Tatyana A. Belash, Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Professor of the Department of Building Structures, Constructions and Materials

AuthorID: 66498

2nd Institutskaya str., 6, bld. 1, Moscow, 109428



References

1. Iakovlev N.A., Khraponova L.V. Inter-module connections in modular construction: A comprehensive review and classification. AlfaBuild, 2025, no. 1(33), pp. 3304–3304. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.57728/ALF.33.4.

2. Shuryn A.B., Zinkevich I.V. Stiffness assessment of bases of off-centre loaded steel columns according to EN 1993-1-8. Vestnik MGSU, 2025, no. 7(20), pp. 1051–1060. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2025.7.1051-1060.

3. Alpatov V.Yu., Lukin A.O., Saharov A.A. The study of rigidity of a steel column base assembly consisting of a support plate. Industrial and Civil Engineering, 2015, no. 9, pp. 9–14. (In Russian). EDN: UKFKDV.

4. Ananjin M.Yu., Fomin N.I., Tchernogubov D.E. Method of the account of a pliability in nodes of metal designs of buildings. Akademicheskiy vestnik Uralniiproekt RAASN, 2009, no. 3, pp. 80–85. (In Russian). EDN: KYVPSB.

5. Ananjin M.Yu., Fomin N.I. Method of the account of a pliability in nodes of metal designs of buildings. Akademicheskiy vestnik Uralniiproekt RAASN, 2010, no. 2, pp. 72–74. (In Russian).EDN: MTEXND.

6. Bagautdinov R.I. Komarov Yu.P. Mostovskiy N.N. Daurov Z.S. Numerical model of beem-to-column joint finite stiffness. Vestnik MGSU, 2019, no. 2(14), pp. 179–187. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2019.2.179-187.

7. Bakshanskiy I.S., Zhabinskiy A.N. Influence of constructive features of bolt flange units on the distribution of internal forces in the transverse frame of a building. BNTU = Problems of modern construction: materials of the International Scientific and Technical Conference. Minsk, May 28, 2019. Minsk: BNTU; 2019, pp. 49–59. (In Russian).

8. Pavlov A.B. Fundamentals of designing steel building structures of building frames taking into account the actual bending stiffeness and strength of the joint connections of their elements [dissertation]. Moscow; 1996. (In Russian).

9. Tusnina V.M., Kolyago A.A. To the issue of actual work of pliable nodes of steel frames of multistory buildings. Industrial and Civil Engineering, 2018, no. 2, pp. 28–34. (In Russian). EDN: YTCEAU.

10. Tusnina V.M. Semi-rigid steel beam-to-column connections. Magazine of Civil Engineering, 2017, no. 5, pp. 25–39. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18720/MCE.73.3.

11. Rumin V.V. Analysis of rigidity of beam to column moment connections with high strength bolts. In: Modern metal and wood building structures: collection of scientific papers, 2012, 1(16), pp. 216–223. (In Russian).

12. Tusnina O.A., Danilov A.I. The stiffness of rigid joints of beam with hollow section column. Magazine of Civil Engineering, 2016, no. 4, pp. 40–51. https://doi.org/10.5862/MCE.64.4.

13. Cho B.H., Lee J.S., Kim H., Kim D.J. Structural performance of a new blind-bolted frame modular beamcolumn connection under lateral loading. Applied Sciences, 2019, no. 9, 1929. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091929.

14. Zhang J.F., Zhao J.J., Deng E.F., Wang H., He J.M., Yu H.X., Fan Y.F. Component method based rotation performance and design method for the connection in ATLS modular house. Thin-Walled Structures, 2021, no. 164, 107803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.107803.

15. Khan K., Yan J.-B. Numerical studies on the seismic behaviour of a prefabricated multi-storey modular steel building with new-type bolted joints. Advanced Steel Construction, 2021, no. 17, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18057/IJASC.2021.17.1.1.

16. Ma R., Xia J., Chang H., Xu B., Zhang L. Experimental and numerical investigation of mechanical proper-ties on novel modular connections with superimposed beams. Engineering Structures, 2021, no. 232, 111858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111858.

17. Choi K.S., Kim H.J. An Analytical Study on Rotational Capacity of Beam-Column Joints in Unit Modular Frames. International Journal of Civil, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 2015, no. 9, pp. 83–86. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1098106.

18. Wang Y., Xia J., Ma R., Xu B., Wang T. Experimental study on the flexural behavior of an innovative modular steel building connection with installed bolts in the columns. Applied Science, 2019, no. 9, 3468. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9173468.

19. Deng E.F., Zong L., Ding Y., Dai X.M., Lou N., Chen Y. Monotonic and cyclic response of bolted connections with welded cover plate for modular steel construction. Engineering Structures, 2018, no. 167, pp. 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.028.

20. Lee S., Park J., Shon S., Kang C. Seismic performance evaluation of the ceiling-bracket-type modu-lar joint with various bracket parameters. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2018, no.150, pp. 298–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.08.008.

21. Lee S., Park J., Kwark E., Shon S., Kang C., Choi H. Verification of the seismic performance of a rigidly connected modular system depending on the shape and size of the ceiling bracket. Materials, 2017, 3(10), 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10030263.

22. Liew J.Y.R., Dai Z., Chua Y.S. Steel concrete composite systems for modular construction of high-rise buildings. Structures, 2019, no. 21, pp. 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.02.010.

23. Shirokov V.S., Alpatov V.Yu., Gordeyev E.A. Research into the stiffness of beam-column joints of modular prefabricated buildings. Vestnik MGSU, 2021, no/ 1(16), pp. 20–29. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2021.1.20-29.

24. Vedyakov I.I., Suslov L.S., Marisiuk A.A., Kashin O.V., Novozhilov M.V. Bearing capacity of a steel frame of a multistorey modular building with consideration of the rigidity of quick-assembled connections. Earthquake engineering. Constructions safety, 2023, no. 6, pp. 8–44. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.37153/2618-9283-2023-6-8-44.

25. Shirokov V.S., Belash T.A., Solovev A.V. Experimental research of intra-module joints stiffness. Bulletin of Civil Engineers, 2024, no. 2, pp. 35–42. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.23968/1999-5571-2024-21-2-35-42.


Review

For citations:


Shirokov V.S., Belash T.A. Influence of intramodular joints stiffness to the stress-strain behavior of modular buildings constructions. Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction. 2026;48(1):126-145. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2026-1(48)-126-145. EDN: ILLQVL

Views: 81

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-9494 (Print)
ISSN 2782-3938 (Online)