Features of a finite-element modeling of a tubular tower for a wind-power unit

Introduction. Being indisputably relevant, an identification of the features of modeling tower structures can simplify the work of engineers and simultaneously move the design decision-making to a qualitatively new level.

Aim. To assess the effect, caused by some particular features of a computational modelling, on the resulting parameter, representing the frequency behavior of a tubular tower for wind-power units.

Materials and Methods. Numerical studies were conducted using a domestic SCAD Office programming and computing suite. In computational modeling, 41st, 42nd, 44th and 50th FE types were used. During the assessment of effects, caused by the finite element type, calculations of a cylindrical tower with fixed parameters were performed, taking into account variations in the type and size of the FE. Estimating factors in calculations included: variations in stresses, as well as in the frequency of first-mode natural oscillations. During the comparison of stress values, the plate of the third from the fixed base row was taken as the design one. Turbowind T600-48 and Eviag EV 100 were considered as wind turbines.

Results. A sufficient discretization value of the computational model for determining the frequency of natural oscillations equals to nR = 12, since a further increase in the value of nR will lead to variations in the frequency of natural oscillations by less than 1%. The individual frequencies of 0.275 and 0.825 Hz were determined for an Eviag EV 100 wind turbine. For a Turbowind T600-48, the range of resonant frequencies is determined due to the presence of a variable rotor speed: starting and maximum frequency ranges of 0.255–0.765 and 0.383–1.149 Hz, respectively.

Conclusions. During the modeling of a tower in the SCAD Office PCS, it is feasible to use the 44th type of finite elements, taking into account the obtained sufficient discretization value. The obtained spectrum of natural and resonant frequencies allows avoiding the appearance of a resonant effect when making design decisions.

1. Basov K.A. ANSYS for designers. Moscow: DMK Press Publ.; 2019. (In Russian).

2. Rychkov S.P. Structural modeling in Femap NX Nastarn. Moscow: DMK Press Publ.; 2013. (In Russian).

3. Telichko V.G., Zlobin S.F., Telichko G.N. Parametric modeling of design schemes in SAP2000. Tula: Nauka Publ.; 2017. (In Russian).

4. Zolochevskiy A.A., Becker A.A. Introduction to ABAQUS. Bristol: Business Investor Group; 2018.

5. Perel’muter A.V., Slivker V.I. Design models of structures and the possibility of their analysis. Kyiv: Stal’ Publ.; 2002. (In Russian).

6. Makovkin G.A., Lihacheva S.Yu. Using FEM to solution of mechanics problems of a deformable solid body. N. Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (NNGASU); 2016. (In Russian).

7. Ermakova A.V. Additional Finite Element Method for Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures at Limit States. Moscow: ASV; 2012.

8. Barabash M.S. Computer modeling of the life cycle processes of construction objects. Kyiv: Stal’ Publ.; 2014. (In Russian).

9. Godat A., Legeron F., Bazonga D. Stability investigation of local buckling behavior of tubular polygon columns under concentric compression. Thin-Walled Structures. 2012;53:31–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2011.12.013

10. Trahair N.S. Flexural-torsional buckling of structures. London: E & FNSpon; 2003.

11. Garifullin M., Trubina D., Vatin N. Local Buckling of Cold-Formed Steel Members with Edge Stiffened Holes. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014;725-726:697–702. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.725-726.697

12. Gonçalves R. Camotim D. Elastic buckling of uniformly compressed thin-walled regular polygonal tubes. Thin-Walled Structures. 2013;71:35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2013.04.016

13. Godat A., Legeron F., Bazonga D. Stability investigation of local buckling behavior of tubular polygon columns under concentric compression. Thin-Walled Structures. 2012;53:131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2011.12.013

14. Vasylev V.N., Garanzha I.M. Features of construction of a design finite element model of multifaceted bent poles in SCAD Office software package. Metallicheskie konstruktsii = Metal Constructions. 2009;15(2):133–140. (In Russian).

15. Gordievskii E.M., Miroshnichenko A.A., Kulganatov A.Z., Solomin E.V., Stanchauskas V.I. Simulation modeling of a wind power plant in Matlab/Simulink program. Izvestiya VUZOV. Severo-Kavkazskii region = Bulletin of Higher Educational Institutions. North Caucasus region. Technical Sciences. 2020;(1):25–32. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17213/1560-3644-2020-1-25-32

16. Alvarez-Anton L., Koob M., Diaz J., Minnert J. Optimization of a hybrid tower for onshore wind turbines by Building Information Modeling and prefabrication techniques. Vizualization in Engineering. 2016;4:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40327-015-0032-4

17. Gorohov E.V., Vasylev V.N., Kuznecov S.G., Garanzha I.M., Lozinskii E.A., Shcherbonos A.G., Pavlovskii R.N. Method for determining the geometric parameters of structures of free-standing multifaceted racks, taking into account the regulation of natural and forced vibrations. Metallicheskie ko nstruktsii = Metal Constructions. 2012;18(2):85–96. (In Russian).

18. Perel’muter A.V., Mikitarenko M.A. Towers for wind turbines: development trends. Vestnik DonNASA = Proceeding of the Donbas National Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2014;(5):8–13. (In Russian).

19. Wang L., Kolios A.J., Luengo M.M., Liu X. Structural optimization of wind turbine towers based on finite element analysis and genetic algorithm. Wind Energy Science. 2016;41. https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2016-41

20. Kudelin A., Kucherov V. Wind ENERGY in Russia: The current state and development trends. Energy Strategy Reviews. 2021;34:100627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100627

21. Lu X., McElroy M.B. Global potential for wind-generated electricity. Wind Energy Onshore Offshore Wind Turbines. 2017;(11):51–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809451-8.00004-7

22. Zhavoronok A.V., Harchenko U.A. Problems of development of the wind energy industry on the example of Russia and European countries. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovacii = Modern scientific researches and innovations. 2015;(7):106–110. (In Russian).

23. Afanas’ev A.A., Baranov N.N. World energy: global problems and development prospects. Energiia: ekonomika, tekhnika, ekologiia. 2021;(4):34–48. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.7868/S0233361921040054

24. Fomenko N.E., Udovikov A.K., Manaenko I.N., Fomenko L.N. Experience in the application of electrical exploration methods to assess the environmental safety of the construction of wind turbines in the Eastern Donbass. Inzhenernyi vestnik Dona = Engineering journal of Don. 2020;(1). (In Russian). Available at: http://www.ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/N1y2020/6270

25. Nekrasov Yu.P. Dynamic effects of wind on metal lattice towers of wind turbines [dissertation]. Makeevka: DonGASA; 2002. (In Russian).