Experimental research of a flexible retaining wall model in laboratory conditions
https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2024-2(41)-103-117
EDN: TEHFGK
Abstract
Introduction. The Russian standards determine the lateral earth pressure at the failure surface stage, which corresponds to the Coulomb’s theory. In this case, the limit values of earth pressure on the flexible wall remain independent from the nature and intensity of deformation of the retaining structure. Therefore, computational methods for retaining walls are to be improved considering the above-mentioned factors.
Aim. To obtain experimental data in order to develop a computational method for determination of the active earth pressure on retaining structures depending on their deformations.
Materials and methods. Experimental tests were carried out by physical simulation for various models of flexible retaining walls using a purpose-designed laboratory test bench. Medium sand was used as a model backfill soil; its physical properties were determined under laboratory conditions in accordance with State Standard 5180-2015.
Results. The tests provided data on the character of backfill soil deformations within the wedge of failure for different kinematic conditions of the retaining wall model and, accordingly, justified the application of inclined block phenomenological model, used to develop a computational method for determining the active earth pressure on retaining walls.
Conclusions. Experimental tests indicate the correlation between deformation nature of the backfill soil and accepted conditions of soil operation during the development of engineering method for determining the lateral earth pressure. The obtained experimental data can be used in adoption and verification of the suggested computational method that enables shoring of excavations to be designed more reasonably in mutual conformity with the actual earth pressure diagrams.
Keywords
About the Author
V. V. BryksinRussian Federation
Vitaly V. Bryksin, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Methods for Calculating Underground Structures and Geotechnical Forecasting
Ryazanskiy ave., 59, Moscow, 109428, Russian Federation
e-mail: geo.pgs@mail.ru
tel.: +7 (926) 581-94-28
References
1. <i>Rubin O.D., Lisichkin S.E., Frolov K.E., Pashchenko F.A., Zyuzina O.V.</i> Experimental studies of reinforced concrete retaining walls. Prirodoobustrojstvo. 2020;(1):72–79. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.34677/1997-6011/2020-1-72-79
2. <i>Saez E., Segaline H., Ubilla J., Llanquilef B.</i> 1-G Experimental study of dynamic pressures and soil displacements in Yielding Rigid Retaining Walls using a transparent laminar box. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Sydney; 2022, pp. 1193–1197.
3. <i>Deng C., Haigh S.K.</i> Sand deformation mechanisms mobilised with active retaining wall movement. Geotechnique. 2022;72(3):260–273. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.20.p.041
4. <i>Yang M., Tang X., Wu Z.</i> Slip Surface and Active Earth Pressure of Cohesionless Narrow Backfill behind Rigid Retaining Walls under Translation Movement Mode. International Journal of Geomechanics. 2020;20(8):04020115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001746
5. <i>Xu L., Lin Y.</i> Experimental Study on the Active Earth Pressure of Narrow Cohesionless Backfills against Rigid Retaining Wall under the Translation Mode. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2020;(7):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8889749
6. <i>Benmebarek N., Labdi H., Benmebarek S.</i> Numerical study of active soil pressure on a rigid retaining wall under various modes of movement. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 2016;(1):24. (In Russian).
7. <i>Alavinezhad S.P., Shahir H.</i> Determination of apparent earth pressure diagram for anchored walls in c–φ soil with surcharge. World Journal of Engineering. 2020;17(4):481–489. https://doi.org/10.1108/wje-09-2019-0269
8. <i>Orazalin Z., Whittle A., Olsen M.</i> Threedimension analyses of excavation support system for the strata center basement on the MIT campus. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2015;141(7):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001326
9. <i>Sharma S., Vinod Prabhu N., Naveen Y., Bhuvaneshwari S.</i> Numerical Modelling of Lateral Deformation of the Cantilever Retaining Wall in Expansive Clays. In: Saride S., Umashankar B., Avirneni D. (eds). Advances in Geotechnical and Transportation Engineering. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol. 71. Springer, Singapore; 2020, pp. 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3662-5_19
10. <i>Bryksin V.V.</i> Calculation of retaining walls by method of inclined blocks. Vestnik NIC Stroitel’stvo = Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction. 2018;17(2):35–49. (In Russian).
11. State Standard 25100-2020. Soils. Classification. Moscow: Standartinform Publ.; 2020. (In Russian).
12. State Standard 12536-2014. Soils. Methods of laboratory granulometric (grain-size) and microaggregate distribution. Moscow: Standartinform Publ.; 2019. (In Russian).
13. State Standard 5180-2015. Soils. Laboratory methods for determination of physical characteristics. Moscow: Standartinform Publ.; 2019. (In Russian).
14. <i>Dubrova G.A.</i> Interaction of soil and structures. Moscow: Rechnoi transport Publ.; 1963. (In Russian).
15. <i>Lazebnik G.E.</i> Investigation of the distribution of soil pressure on a model of flexible single-tank retaining walls. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 1966;(2):3–5. (In Russian).
16. <i>Rowe P.W.</i> Anchored Sheet-Pile Walls. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. 1952;1(1):27–70. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1952.10942
17. <i>Goncharov Yu.M.</i> Experimental study of the interaction of sheet pile fencing and soil. In: Soil mechanics. Proceedings of the Scientific Research Institute of Foundations and Underground Structures. Vol. 43. Мoscow: Gosstroiizdat; 1961, pp. 27–41. (In Russian).
18.
Review
For citations:
Bryksin V.V. Experimental research of a flexible retaining wall model in laboratory conditions. Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction. 2024;41(2):103-117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2024-2(41)-103-117. EDN: TEHFGK