Preview

Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction

Advanced search

Subsurface contour unevenness in seismic microzoning of a point facility

Abstract

Introduction. Unconformable bedding of layers in the upper part of a geological section is widely applied in seismic microzoning (SMZ) practice. This challenges the use of some popular software for interpreting the effect of soil massif on the seismic wave field. The use of complex processing software, such as the finite element method, often appears unprofitable in the practice of SMZ for point facilities.

Aim. To develop simple techniques for obtaining solutions acceptable in terms of accuracy and labor costs for SMZ tasks including the unevenness of the subsurface contour.

Materials and methods. The paper considers the results of SMZ at the construction site of an extra critical point facility in Khabarovsk, Russian Federation. The main methodological approach of this study represents soil conditions by a series of models formed based on well data. We use computer simulation of wave fields to determine the response spectra and dynamic coefficients of each model. Seismic intensity increments are calculated using the direct SMZ method.

Results. Response spectra and dynamic coefficients obtained for each model were used to calculate increments and values of total seismic intensity. These values take into account the subsurface contour unevenness to define the boundaries of exact seismic intensity values.

Conclusions. The described methodology is supplemented with the results of SMZ during surveys for the construction of a point facility, taking into account the subsurface contour unevenness.

About the Authors

A. S. Aleshin
Schmidt Institute of Physics of The Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Alexander S. Aleshin*, Dr. Sci. (Phys. and Math.), Chief Researcher, Laboratory 701

Bolshaya Gruzinskaya str., 10, bld. 1, Moscow, 123242, Russian Federation

e-mail: asa@ifz.ru



V. V. Pogrebchenko
Schmidt Institute of Physics of The Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Pogrebchenko, Senior Researcher, Laboratory 701

Bolshaya Gruzinskaya str., 10, bld. 1, Moscow, 123242, Russian Federation



S. N. Nikitin
Schmidt Institute of Physics of The Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Sergey N. Nikitin, Researcher, Laboratory 701

Bolshaya Gruzinskaya str., 10, bld. 1, Moscow, 123242, Russian Federation



References

1. SP 14.13330.2018. Seismic building design code. Updated version of SNiP II-7-81*. Moscow: Standartinform Publ.; 2018. (In Russian).

2. SP 283.1325800.2016. Highly critical construction projects. Rules of seismic microzonation. Moscow: Ministry of Construction of Russia; 2016. (In Russian).

3. <i>Aleshin A.S., Pogrebchenko V.V., Nikitin S.N.</i> Solving a direct problem as a new method of seismic microzonation. Earthquake engineering. Safety of structures. 2021;(2):38–53. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.37153/2618-9283-2021-2-38-53

4. <i>Aleshin A.S.</i> Continuous theory of seismic microzoning. Moscow: Nauchnyi mir Publ.; 2017. (In Russian).

5. RSN 60-86. Engineering surveys for construction. Seismic microzoning. Standards for the production of works. Moscow: Stroyizdat Publ.; 1986. (In Russian).

6. <i>Goryainov N.N.,</i> ed. Application of seismoacoustic methods in hydrogeology and engineering geology. Moscow: Nedra Publ.; 1992. (In Russian).

7. <i>Bardet J.P., Tobita T., Nera F.</i> Computer Program for Nonlinear Earthquake Site Response Analyses of Layered Soil Deposits. University of Southern California; 2001.


Review

For citations:


Aleshin A.S., Pogrebchenko V.V., Nikitin S.N. Subsurface contour unevenness in seismic microzoning of a point facility. Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction. 2025;44(1). (In Russ.)

Views: 53


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-9494 (Print)
ISSN 2782-3938 (Online)