Experimental studies on the strength of reinforced concrete elements with lap joints of compressed reinforcement in a single design section under axial compression

Introduction. Current Russian standards impose stricter requirements on the overlap length of reinforcing bars in lap joints executed within a single section of the structure compared to staggered lap joints. Due to insufficient research on this issue concerning compressed reinforcement, these requirements lack comprehensive justification and have been adopted with some caution, which leads to increased reinforcement consumption. This implies investigating various possible design solutions for lap joints of reinforcement bars made in a single design section and experimental verifying of their impact on the strength of compressed reinforced concrete elements under static loads.

Aim. To conduct experimental studies on the load-bearing capacity of compressed reinforced concrete elements with different variants of lap joints of reinforcement located in a single design section.

Materials and methods. Experimental studies were conducted by testing reinforced concrete elements subjected to centrally applied static compressive loads. The studies were carried out in accordance with the provisions of current standards.

Results. Experimental data were obtained regarding the strength of reinforced concrete elements with various types of lap joints of reinforcement located in a single design section under axial compression.

Conclusions. Experimental studies have determined the failure loads and the failure patterns in the test samples. Failure for all test samples occurred outside the lap joint. Depending on the design solution of the sample, the values of failure loads for the studied samples with lap joints of reinforcement were lower by an average of 4 % than for samples without joints or higher by 2–3 %.

1. SP 63.13330.2018. Concrete and reinforced concrete structures. General provisions (with Change No. 1) [internet]. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/554403082. (In Russian).

2. EN 1992-1-1. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures – Part 1: General rules and rules for buildings [internet]. Available at: https://www.phd.eng.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/en.1992.1.1.2004.pdf.

3. CEB-FIB Model Code 1990: Design Code; 1993. https://doi.org/10.1680/ceb-fipmc1990.35430

4. ACI 318-19. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (Reapproved 2022). American Concrete Institute; 2019. https://doi.org/10.14359/51716937

5. DIN 1045-1:2008-08. Tragwerke aus Beton, Stahlbeton und Spannbeton – Teil 1: Planung, Bemessung und Konstruktion. https://doi.org/10.31030/3446676

6. FIB Model Code for Concrete Structure 2010; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783433604090

7. <i>Cairns J., Balazs G.L., Cairns J., Eligehausen R., Lettow S., Metelli G.,</i> et al. <i>fib</i> Bulletin 72. Bond and anchorage of embedded reinforcement: Background to the fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010; 2014 May. http://doi.org/10.35789/fib.bull.0072

8. <i>Cairns J.W.</i> The Strength of lapped joints in reinforced concrete columns [PhD thesis]. The University of Glasgo; 1976.

9. <i>Cairns J.</i> Bond Strength of Compression Splices: A Reevaluation of Test Data. ACI Journal Proceedings. 1985;82(4):510–516. https://doi.org/10.14359/10363

10. <i>Pfister J.F., Mattock A.H.</i> High Strength Bars as Concrete Reinforcement, Part 5: Lapped Splices in Concentrically Loaded Columns. Journal. PCA Research and Development Laboratories. 1963;5(2):27–40.

11. <i>Zenin S.A., Sychev K.D.</i> To assign the length of overlapping joints of compressed reinforcement in one design section of reinforced concrete elements. Beton i Zhelezobeton = Concrete and Reinforced Concrete. 2024;623(4):18–28. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.37538/0005-9889-2024-4(623)-18-28