SCAD model of solid finite elements: calculation of reinforced concrete waffle slabs
https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2023-2(37)-18-36
EDN: DPLFAF
Abstract
Introduction. Current requirements for structural engineering oblige designers to use structures capable of resisting progressive collapse. Such structures include multiribbed reinforced concrete waffle slabs. Spatial systems are multiple indeterminate, their calculation is carried out in software systems based on the finite element method. Models of ribbed structures can be developed from different types of finite elements. The forces determined by different models can vary significantly, which is confirmed by the examples available in the literature.
Aim. To detect a simple and accurate finite element model for computer-aided calculating the ribbed reinforced concrete waffle slab.
Materials and methods. The study was carried out by comparing the bending moments obtained analytically and in the SCAD software by the finite element method for beams in waffle slabs of 12.0 × 18.0 m in plan with caissons of 1.5 × 2.25 m. The bar model consisting of a T-beam-and-girder construction and a solid model of bulk finite elements are calculated.
Results. The bending moments, calculated both analytically and using a solid model, have similar values. The maximum deviations of the computer calculation from the analytical method are from -3.2 to +2.6 %. The maximum deviations of the values of bending moments obtained when comparing the solid model with the bar model are from -9.2 to +4.0 %.
Conclusion. The finite element model, which is based on solving the volumetric problem of the elastic theory, is an effective verification model for studying complex systems; however, it is time-consuming and difficult for data analysis. A solid model can be recommended for studying individual structures or their critical zones.
About the Authors
M. V. MozgolovRussian Federation
Mikhail V. Mozgolov, Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Associate Professor, Department of Construction Works
October Revolution str., 408, Kolomna, 140402
E. V. Kozlova
Russian Federation
Elizaveta V. Kozlova, 4th year student
October Revolution str., 408, Kolomna, 140402
References
1. SP 385.1325800.2018. Protection of buildings and structures against progressive collapse. Design code. Basic statements. Moscow: Standartinform Publ.; 2018. (In Russian).
2. Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation: 29 december 2004, No 190-FZ [internet]. Available at: https://normativ.kontur.ru/document?moduleId=1&documentId=443205. (In Russian).
3. SP 333.1325800.2020. Building information modeling. Modeling guidelines for various project life cycle stages [internet]. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/573514520. (In Russian).
4. State Standard 27751-2014. Reliability for constructions and foundations. General principles. Moscow: Standartinform Publ.; 2015. (In Russian).
5. Karpilovskiy V.S., Kriksunov E.Z., Malyarenko A.A., Fialko S.Yu., Perel’muter A.V., Perel’muter M.A. SCAD Office. Version 21. The SCAD ++computing complex. Moscow: SKAD SOFT Publ.; 2015. (In Russian).
6. Sekulovich M. Finite element method. Moscow: Stroyizdat Publ.; 1993. (In Russian).
7. Gorodetskiy A.S., Evzerov I.D. Computer models of structures. Kyiv: Fakt Publ.; 2005. (In Russian).
8. Gorodetskiy A.S., Barabash M.S., Sidorov V.N. Computer modeling in tasks of constructions. Moscow: ASV Publ.; 2016. (In Russian).
9. Perel’muter A.V., Slivker V.I. Design models of structures and the possibility of their analysis. Moscow: DMK Press Publ.; 2007. (In Russian).
10. Perel’muter A.V. Conversations about construction mechanics. Moscow: SCAD Soft Publ., ASV Publ.; 2016. (In Russian).
11. Nikitin K.E., Kirsanov O.A. Comparative study of finite element methods of calculation of ribbed reinforced concrete floors. Structural Mechanics of Engineering Constructions and Buildings. 2022;18(3):242–254. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/1815-5235-2022-18-3-242-254
12. Malakhova A.N. Monolithic caisson floors of buildings. Vestnik MGSU = Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture. 2013;(1):79–86. (In Russian).
13. Shibaeva V.D. Investigation of the stress-strain state of monolithic coffered ceilings. Molodoi uchenyi = Young Scientist. 2021;(16):119–123. (In Russian).
14. Mozgolov M.V., Kozlova E.V. Verification of SCAD models of reinforced concrete caisson floor on the basis of an analytical calculation method that takes into account spans and rigidity of the structure. Bulletin of Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov. 2023;8(2):29–40. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.34031/2071-7318-2022-8-2-29-40
15. State Standard R 57700.10-2018. Numerical modeling of physical processes. Determination of stress-strain state. Verification and validation of numerical models of complex structural elements in the elastic region. Moscow: Standartinform Publ.; 2018. (In Russian).
16. Mozgolov M.V., Kozlova E.V. Use of analytical method for calculating stiffnesses of straight waffle slabs. Vestnik NIC Stroitel’stvo = Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction. 2022;33(2):122–138. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2022-2(33)-122-138
17. Mozgolov M.V., Kozlova E.V. Use of analytical method for calculating stiffnesses of straight waffle slabs. Part 2. Calculation using relative stiffness of beams. Vestnik NIC Stroitel’stvo = Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction. 2022;35(4):62–79. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2022-4(35)-62-79
18. Alyamovskiy A.A. Engineering calculations in SolidWorks Simulation. Moscow: DMK Press Publ.; 2019. (In Russian).
19. Pekin D.A. Plate steel-reinforced concrete construction. Moscow: DIA Publ.; 2010. (In Russian).
20. SP 430.1325800.2018. Monolithic structural systems. Design rules. Moscow: Standartinform Publ.; 2019. (In Russian).
21. Belostotsky A.M., Dubinsky S.I. Analysis of the causes of the collapse of the structures of the coating of the Transvaal Park SOC. Ansys Solutions. Russian edition [internet]. 2007 Winter: 5–12. Available at: https://scadsoft.com/download/Transvaal.pdf. (In Russian).
22. Flat girderless reinforced concrete floors: a methodological guide [Internet]. Moscow; 2017. Available at: https://www.faufcc.ru/upload/methodical_materials/mp60_2017.pdf. (In Russian).
23. Perelmuter A.V., Tur V.V. Whether we are ready to proceed to a nonlinear analysis at designing? International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering. 2017;13(3):86–102. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22337/1524-5845-2017-13-3-86-102
24. Mozgolov M.V., Kozlova E.V. Creation of a SCAD verification model for the design calculations of a reinforced-concrete waffle slab floor system. Vestnik NIC Stroitel’stvo = Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction. 2022;32(1):128–140. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2022-1(32)-128-140
Review
For citations:
Mozgolov M.V., Kozlova E.V. SCAD model of solid finite elements: calculation of reinforced concrete waffle slabs. Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction. 2023;37(2):18-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2023-2(37)-18-36. EDN: DPLFAF